PPCC Library Integration Test

Browse Library

51 documents found.

Active browse filters: Topic: topic:l2:environment_public_spaces/coastal

Library Search

Coastal

Browse all topics
Community Life 181 Environment & Public Spaces 167 Governance 1,299 Land Use 269 Palisades Fire 2025 161 Public Safety 207 Reference Resources 10
Advanced Filters

Clear

3 results found.

Active filters: Coastal × Year: 2018 × Clear all

  • Letter - Nov 29, 2018 (Coastal Commission Trailhead Signed)

    Letter November 29, 2018

    Environment & Public SpacesCoastal

    The Pacific Palisades Community Council wrote to the California Coastal Commission expressing support for efforts to repair and refurbish the bathrooms and parking lot at the Temescal Canyon Trail Ridge Access point at 16701 Via La Costa, citing health and safety concerns due to trash, graffiti, unsanitary conditions, and proximity to flammable vegetation.

  • Letter - Nov 12, 2018 (Beach Access Restriction Letteer)

    Letter November 14, 2018

    Environment & Public SpacesCoastalMinutesMotionsWrac

    The Westside Regional Alliance of Councils, representing 15 neighborhood councils including Pacific Palisades Community Council, wrote to the California Coastal Commission urging support for a Coastal Development Permit that restricts beach access from midnight to 5 am, citing public safety and environmental protection concerns. The letter argues that local government should defer to local conditions and stakeholder determinations regarding public beach access policies.

  • w15c-7-2018-addenda

    Legal Filing July 13, 2018

    Environment & Public SpacesCoastal

    This California Coastal Commission addendum addresses supplemental correspondence and clarifications regarding Appeal No. A-5-PPL-18-0035 for a proposed commercial eldercare facility in Pacific Palisades, including corrections to brush clearance requirements, responses to appellant concerns about environmental impacts, traffic, parking, and consistency with Regional Interpretive Guidelines, and staff's conclusion that the appellants' grounds raise no substantial issue.