PPCC Library Integration Test
Browse Library
134 documents found.
Active browse filters: Topic: topic:l1:land_use; Document type: Letter
-
PPCC Letter Re Sober Living Density
Letter | February 19, 2026
-
Supervisor Horvath Letter to PPCC _Gladstone Redevelopment Project -merged (1)
Letter | February 15, 2026
-
PPCC Letter Village Streetscape Improvements
Letter | January 23, 2026
-
PPCC EC Ltr ACE Yard #2
Letter | December 31, 2025
-
CD11 Letter - Coastal Dev Permit App (1)
Letter | October 7, 2025
-
PPCC EC Letter PSA Gladstones
Letter | October 7, 2025
-
PPCC EC Letter Gladstones
Letter | October 5, 2025
-
PPCC Letter CF 25-1083 (Park)
Letter | September 29, 2025
-
PPCC Letter Gov. Veto SB 79
Letter | September 14, 2025
-
Message to Legislators re SB 79
Letter | September 4, 2025
Library Search
Land Use
Browse all topics
Advanced Filters
-
Land UsePlanning & Density
The Palms Neighborhood Council requests a minimum 6-month delay in the Palms-Mar Vista-Del Rey Community Plan approval process to allow for additional public comment periods, a pandemic impact assessment, updated data projections, and expanded stakeholder outreach before the Environmental Impact Report phase begins.
-
Land UseStreet FurnitureSignage
The Pacific Palisades Community Council and Palisades PRIDE jointly oppose the City's planned Request for Proposals to install digital advertising signage in bus shelters throughout Los Angeles, particularly in Pacific Palisades, citing concerns about visual blight, public safety hazards, and impacts on the community's character and aesthetic appeal. They request that the City halt the RFP process to allow for public input and community engagement, and seek an exemption for Pacific Palisades from any digital signage installation.
-
Land UseWracPlanning & Density
Pacific Palisades Community Council requested clarification from Councilmembers Bonin and Ryu regarding CF 1098, which passed with an amendment calling for Planning to analyze standards and zoning regulations that may limit single-family home size. Councilmember Bonin responded confirming that different iterations based on locale and neighborhood character would be considered in the analysis.
-
Land UseWracPlanning & Density
The Pacific Palisades Community Council opposes a proposed citywide cap on home size (CF 20-1098), arguing that such a blanket regulation fails to account for the diverse topography, neighborhood character, and local conditions across different communities. The Council advocates instead for tailored zoning regulations that reflect the unique characteristics of individual neighborhoods.
-
Land UseWracPlanning & Density
The Pacific Palisades Community Council submitted comments on a motion to expand the Hillside Construction Regulation District/Pilot Program, supporting a halt on construction grading and hauling during windy and Red Flag Days as determined by LAFD, and supporting further review and study to determine whether the program should be expanded to their community. The Council noted insufficient time for detailed review and indicated their position may be supplemented after full Board review.
-
Land UseWracPlanning & Density
The Pacific Palisades Community Council opposes a proposed citywide cap on single-family home sizes, arguing that a uniform approach is inappropriate for a diverse city and that the term 'size' requires clarification regarding whether it refers to height, FAR, or building envelope. The council takes no position on the motion's request to ban mansionization in multi-family zones.
-
Land UseWracPlanning & Density
The Pacific Palisades Community Council requests Governor Newsom's veto of SB 1120, a housing density bill that would increase residential density statewide without adequately protecting residents in Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones, arguing that increased density would compromise evacuation routes during wildfires in their community. The council also opposes similar housing bills (SB 902, 1085, and 1385) unless they include unconditional exemptions for VHFHSZ areas.
-
Land UseWracPlanning & Density
The Pacific Palisades Community Council opposes housing density bills SB 902 and SB 1120 scheduled for hearing on August 18, arguing that increased density in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone poses serious public safety risks during wildfire evacuations due to limited ingress and egress routes. The council urges the Assembly Local Government Committee to decline moving these bills forward unless they are amended to include an unconditional exemption for all parcels within the VHFHSZ.
-
Land UseWracPlanning & Density
The Pacific Palisades Community Council opposes housing density bills SB 902, 1120, and 1385 before the California Assembly Local Government Committee, citing public safety concerns in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone and requesting an unconditional exemption for all parcels in such areas. The council argues that increased density would compromise emergency vehicle access and resident evacuation routes during mandatory wildfire evacuations in their community.
-
Land UseMinutesMotionsWracDevelopment Projects
The Pacific Palisades Community Council sent a message to Los Angeles City Planning on July 3, 2020, reiterating its opposition to the proposed height and density of a development project at 17346 Sunset Boulevard, referencing its previous position letter from August 25, 2019.