PPCC Library Integration Test
Browse Library
13 documents found.
Active browse filters: Document type: Memo
-
Memo PPCC Bd ACE permit
Memo | December 27, 2025
-
Gladstones MemoR
Memo | October 16, 2025
-
TOS_24-026 Trail to Temescal Feasibility Routes 3-27-2024 (1)
Memo | May 30, 2024
-
Park Rules Sign - Revision Issues
Memo | September 10, 2023
-
DRAFT 2016 Potrero Canyon Pedestrian Crossing Feasibility Study Technical Memorandum
Memo | June 16, 2023
-
TOS 202_Addendum No. 1 (1)
Memo | May 22, 2023
-
Proposed Amendments to Pacific Palisades Commercial
Memo | March 18, 2023
-
Election Cmte Message July-Aug. 2020
Memo | August 12, 2020
-
PFC Submission of Information to PPCCR
Memo | February 11, 2020
-
Memo to PPCC and the Community from Ami Fields
Memo | April 5, 2019
Library Search
Browse all topics
Advanced Filters
-
Land UseVillage Project
The PPCC Executive Committee took emergency action to submit comments supporting the City's adoption of the Palisades Village Project MND, citing broad community support evidenced by positive comments from Board members and the public, with most negative comments addressing issues outside the MND's scope or already addressed by the applicant. The Committee determined that approximately 86% of eligible Board members supported the motion and that the MND's conclusions were warranted under applicable regulatory frameworks.
-
Land UsePotrero CanyonMinutesVillage Project
The Pacific Palisades Community Council Chair appointed a Land Use Committee consisting of eight members to provide thorough analysis and recommendations on zoning and land use issues affecting the community. The committee will review pending city-sponsored land use policy initiatives and individual real estate development projects according to established PPCC policies.
-
Land UseMotionsWracVHFHSZ
The PPCC Executive Committee authorized emergency action to submit comments supporting the City's adoption of the Palisades Village Project MND because a Board vote could not occur before the City's deadline, and the committee found broad community support for the project based on positive comments from Board members and the public. The committee documented that negative comments were largely outside the MND scope, and that even critics of specific aspects generally supported the overall project.