PPCC Library Integration Test
Browse Library
13 documents found.
Active browse filters: Document type: Memo
-
Memo PPCC Bd ACE permit
Memo | December 27, 2025
-
Gladstones MemoR
Memo | October 16, 2025
-
TOS_24-026 Trail to Temescal Feasibility Routes 3-27-2024 (1)
Memo | May 30, 2024
-
Park Rules Sign - Revision Issues
Memo | September 10, 2023
-
DRAFT 2016 Potrero Canyon Pedestrian Crossing Feasibility Study Technical Memorandum
Memo | June 16, 2023
-
TOS 202_Addendum No. 1 (1)
Memo | May 22, 2023
-
Proposed Amendments to Pacific Palisades Commercial
Memo | March 18, 2023
-
Election Cmte Message July-Aug. 2020
Memo | August 12, 2020
-
PFC Submission of Information to PPCCR
Memo | February 11, 2020
-
Memo to PPCC and the Community from Ami Fields
Memo | April 5, 2019
Library Search
Browse all topics
Advanced Filters
-
Environment & Public SpacesUrban Forest
This document analyzes proposed revisions to Potrero Park's rules sign, categorizing eight requested changes by priority and noting which were adopted or rejected. The analysis addresses public safety concerns, legal compliance with Los Angeles Municipal Code, and clarity issues regarding firearms, biking, alcohol, and other park regulations.
-
Environment & Public SpacesCoastalPotrero Canyon
This addendum to a Task Order Solicitation for the Potrero Canyon Pacific Coast Highway Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Project provides answers to consultant questions regarding project requirements, references, budget, and deliverables, and includes two reference studies from 2016 and 2018 evaluating pedestrian crossing alternatives. The 2016 feasibility study concludes that a bridge crossing is the most feasible option among four alternatives evaluated based on cost, constructability, permitting, and safety factors.
-
Land UseEventsMinutesPlanning & Density
This document proposes amendments to the Pacific Palisades Commercial Village and Neighborhoods Specific Plan to add new neighborhood areas (labeled as Neighborhood Area D and potentially others) with specific development standards including a 30-foot height limit, residential floor area ratios ranging from 0.55 to 0.65 based on lot size, lot coverage limits, encroachment planes, and side yard setbacks. The proposed standards are intended to apply development regulations consistent with R1V1 zoning to areas currently outside the Hillside Area.