PPCC Library Integration Test
Browse Library
80 documents found.
Active browse filters: Topic: topic:l2:land_use/vhfhsz
-
PPCC Letter Village Streetscape Improvements
Letter | January 23, 2026
-
PPCC Press Release
Press Release | January 6, 2026
-
Report_NORC and PPCC Final
Report | January 3, 2026
-
PPCC EC Ltr ACE Yard #2
Letter | December 31, 2025
-
PPCC EC Ltr ACE Rebuilding Yard Permit
Letter | December 27, 2025
-
PPCC Letter ACE Permit Hearing
Letter | December 20, 2025
-
Gladstones MemoR
Memo | October 16, 2025
-
PPCC EC Letter PSA Gladstones
Letter | October 7, 2025
-
PPCC EC Letter Gladstones
Letter | October 5, 2025
-
PPCC Letter CF 25-0848-Evacuations-Reports
Letter | August 26, 2025
Library Search
VHFHSZ
Browse all topics
Advanced Filters
-
Public SafetyMotionsWracVHFHSZCell Tower Regulation
The Pacific Palisades Community Council opposes AB 57, stating the bill would severely restrict local government authority to regulate wireless telecommunications facilities and cell tower siting, and expressing concern that it may curtail environmental review requirements under the California Coastal Act for facilities in coastal zones. The council urges Senator Hueso to vote against the bill.
-
Land UseMotionsWracVHFHSZ
The Pacific Palisades Community Council submitted comments to the City Planning Commission regarding the Archer School for Girls project, expressing concerns about potential traffic congestion impacts on Pacific Palisades, particularly regarding overlap with the California Incline replacement project scheduled to begin April 20, 2015. The Council urged that no approval be granted without thorough assessment of cumulative construction impacts and verifiable assurances that negative traffic impacts can be mitigated.
-
Land UseMotionsWracVHFHSZ
The Pacific Palisades Community Council submitted a letter to the West Los Angeles Planning Commission regarding a proposed multi-family residential development at 16990-17000 Sunset Boulevard, reiterating its request for a Focused Environmental Impact Report to be prepared prior to issuance of a Coastal Development Permit, with specific focus on soils, hydrology, haul routes, traffic, and storm-drain/sewer access. The council also requested that the Planning Commission apply and enforce all applicable City zoning regulations and Coastal Act provisions.
-
Environment & Public SpacesParks & RecreationMotionsWracVHFHSZ
The Pacific Palisades Community Council expresses support for Senate Bill 218, which would end photo enforcement of stop signs by the Mountains Recreation Conservancy Authority (MRCA) within parklands. The council argues that MRCA's legislative exception to the California Vehicle Code is unwarranted and has been abused, citing the placement of photo enforcement machines in Temescal Canyon Gateway Park at intersections with no accident history or significant traffic.
-
Public SafetyMotionsWracVHFHSZHomeless Camping
The Pacific Palisades Community Council urges immediate implementation of the parks storage ordinance (LAMC 63.44) and opposes certain proposed amendments to the sidewalks storage ordinance (LAMC 56.11), instead recommending alternative amendments including a 300-foot buffer zone from residences, retention of specific personal item protections, and clarified ADA access language.
-
Land UseMotionsWracVHFHSZ
The Pacific Palisades Community Council adopted a motion opposing short-term rentals in residential zones while recommending strict regulations if legalization occurs, including owner-occupancy requirements, a 30-night annual cap, mandatory permits, liability insurance, transient occupancy tax collection, and platform accountability. The motion specifies requirements for host registration, neighbor notification, wage compliance, and establishes appeal and private action rights for affected residents.
-
Community LifeCivic AdvocacyMotionsWracVHFHSZ
The Pacific Palisades Community Council opposes city-wide legalization of sidewalk and street vending due to concerns about impacts on businesses, residential neighborhoods, ADA access, and enforcement, but supports special vending district programs only if neighborhood councils can approve district boundaries and vendor concentrations with distance limits from sensitive uses. The council submitted this position to Mayor Garcetti and city council members regarding proposed amendments to LAMC Section 42.00.