PPCC Library Integration Test

Library Search

Motions & Positions

• 17000 Sunset Project CCC Oct 2016

  Letter September 30, 2016

  Land UseMinutesMotionsWracDevelopment Projects

  The Pacific Palisades Community Council opposes a developer's appeal to the California Coastal Commission regarding a proposed multi-family residential development at 16990-17000 W. Sunset Boulevard, citing geological and hydrological concerns with the oceanfront bluff site and requesting the Commission uphold the West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission's denial of the project.

  

• MVCC MOTION RE FLIGHT APPROACH PATHS TO LAX

  Motion September 27, 2016

  Public SafetyMinutesMotionsWracAircraft Noise

  The Mar Vista Community Council passed a motion requesting that the Los Angeles City Council seek information from the FAA regarding changes to flight approach paths to LAX that began in October 2015, which have resulted in increased noise and lower altitude flights over Mar Vista and other neighborhoods. The motion expresses support for flight approaches that would reduce noise impacts on affected communities.

  

• Bluffs Project WLA APC Findings Letter

  Letter August 19, 2016

  Land UseMotionsWracVHFHSZ

  The Pacific Palisades Community Council requests that the West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission correct errors and omissions in the New Findings issued on July 27, 2016 for a project at 16990-17000 Sunset Boulevard, asserting that the findings do not accurately reflect the Commission's December 2, 2015 hearing determinations.

  

• Letter In Support of Specific Plan

  Letter July 20, 2016

  Land UseMotionsWracVHFHSZ

  The Pacific Palisades Community Council submitted a letter to the West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission regarding a development project at 881 Alma Real Drive, reaffirming its support for the Pacific Palisades Commercial Village and Neighborhoods Specific Plan and advocating for strict adherence to established planning and zoning regulations without exemptions.

  

• AB 2788 Letter

  Letter June 19, 2016

  Community LifeCivic AdvocacyMotionsWracVHFHSZ

  The Pacific Palisades Community Council opposes AB 2788, arguing that the bill would excessively restrict local government authority to regulate wireless telecommunications facilities in public rights of way and on public property, particularly in environmentally sensitive areas like the Coastal Zone. The organization urges the Senate Energy, Utilities & Communications Committee to vote against the bill and requests that Assemblymember Gatto withdraw it.

  

• VillageProjectPLUMLetter

  Letter June 5, 2016

  Land UseMotionsWracVHFHSZ

  The Pacific Palisades Community Council submitted a letter of support to the Los Angeles City Council PLUM Committee for approval of the Palisades Village Project, stating that the position reflects community consensus. The letter references prior testimony and submissions to the City Planning Commission regarding the project.

  

• BMO-BHO Amendment Letter May 2016

  Letter May 28, 2016

  Land UseMotionsWracVHFHSZ

  The Pacific Palisades Community Council unanimously opposed the proposed Baseline Mansionization/Baseline Hillside Code Amendment on May 26, 2016, stating that the draft fails to account for the unique aspects and character of the community regarding design, grading, and property values for R1 zoned properties. The council urged the City Council and Planning Department to revise the amendment to accommodate Pacific Palisades' particular needs and concerns.

  

• BMO-BHO Amendment Letter

  Letter March 6, 2016

  Land UseMotionsWracVHFHSZ

  The Pacific Palisades Community Council submitted a letter opposing the proposed Baseline Mansionization/Baseline Hillside Code Amendment, requesting postponement of the CPC hearing scheduled for March 2016 to allow for additional study and public comment. The council cited six concerns including insufficient public process, lack of economic impact analysis, unclear language regarding height and size measurements, and insufficient demonstration of community consensus for the amendment.

  

• MND Considerations

  Memo March 3, 2016

  Land UseMotionsWracVHFHSZ

  The PPCC Executive Committee authorized emergency action to submit comments supporting the City's adoption of the Palisades Village Project MND because a Board vote could not occur before the City's deadline, and the committee found broad community support for the project based on positive comments from Board members and the public. The committee documented that negative comments were largely outside the MND scope, and that even critics of specific aspects generally supported the overall project.

  Memo

• PPCC MND Letter

  Letter March 3, 2016

  Land UseMotionsWracVHFHSZ

  The Pacific Palisades Community Council supports adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (ENV-2015-2715 MND) for the Palisades Village Project, based on the City's determination that the project will have no unmitigated significant impacts and a traffic study reviewed by the Council's Transportation Advisor. The Council's support is conditional on establishment of a Village Project Committee to monitor and address issues during construction and operations.